Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
US Should Stop Blocking Palestinian Rights,
Support Commitment to Abide by International Law
By Human Rights Watch
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, April 3, 2014
The
US government should support rather than oppose Palestinian actions to
join international treaties that promote respect for human rights, Human
Rights Watch said today.
On April 1, 2014, the Palestinian leader,
Mahmoud Abbas, signed accession instruments for 15 treaties, including the
core treaties on human rights and the laws of war. On April 2, the US
ambassador to the
United Nations, Samantha Power,
testified in front of Congress, that in response to the “new
Palestinian actions” that the “solemn commitment” by the US to “stand with
Israel,” “extends to our firm opposition to any and all unilateral
[Palestinian] actions in the international arena.”
“It is
disturbing that the Obama administration, which already has a record of
resisting international accountability for Israeli rights abuses, would
also oppose steps to adopt treaties requiring Palestinian authorities to
uphold human rights,” said
Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “The US
should press both the Palestinians and the Israelis to better abide by
international human rights standards.”
Palestine’s adoption of human rights and laws-of-war treaties would
not cause any change in Israel’s international legal obligations.
Abbas signed letters of accession to core human rights treaties including
the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights and the conventions on the rights of the child;
the elimination of discrimination against women; and against torture,
apartheid, and genocide. Abbas also signed requests for Palestine to
accede to treaties on the laws of war, including the Hague Regulations of
1907, the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and their first additional
protocol.
The human rights treaties he signed would impose
obligations on the Palestinian government to respect, protect, and fulfill
the human rights of people under their authority and effective control.
The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank was not eligible to sign human
rights treaties but its officials had repeatedly pledged to uphold human
rights norms. Human Rights Watch has documented serious abuses by
Palestinian security forces, including
torture, arbitrary
arrest, and the suppression of free
speech and
assembly.
Ratification of the Hague Regulations and Geneva
Conventions would strengthen the obligations of Palestinian forces to
abide by international rules on armed conflict. Palestinian armed groups
are already obliged by customary international law on armed conflict,
including prohibitions on targeting civilians and on carrying out attacks
that do not discriminate between civilians and combatants. Armed groups in
Gaza, which operate outside the authority or effective control of the
Palestinian leadership that signed the treaties, have committed war crimes
by launching indiscriminate rocket attacks against Israeli population
centers.
Abbas signed the treaties for the state of Palestine,
which the UN General Assembly granted non-member observer state status in
2012.
The US appears to oppose Palestine joining human rights
treaties in part because it is afraid they will gain greater support for
Palestinian statehood outside the framework of negotiations with Israel.
According to Power’s testimony to a congressional subcommittee on April 2,
the US has “a monthly meeting with the Israelis” to coordinate responses
to possible Palestinian actions at the UN, which the US is concerned could
upset peace negotiations. Power said that the US had been “fighting on
every front” before peace negotiations restarted in 2013 to prevent such
Palestinian actions. Discussing US legislation that bars US funding from
UN agencies that accept Palestine as a member, Power noted, “The spirit
behind the legislation is to deter Palestinian action [at the UN], that is
what we do all the time and that is what we will continue to do.”
The US may also fear that the Palestinian moves are only a first step
towards joining the
International Criminal Court (ICC). But Abbas did not sign the Rome
Statute of the ICC, which would allow the court to have jurisdiction over
war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed in Palestine
or by Palestinians. Power, in her remarks, said that the US is “absolutely
adamant” that Palestine should not join the ICC because it “really poses a
profound threat to Israel” and would be “devastating to the peace
process.”
In either case, the US is mistaken to oppose a step that
might lead to greater respect for rights, which could help create a better
environment for peace negotiations, Human Rights Watch said.
“The
US should stop allowing its separate concerns to stand in the way of a
step that could enhance Palestinian authorities’ and armed groups’ respect
for basic rights,” Stork said. “The US made the wrong decision to oppose
greater rights protections.”
On April 1, the day Abbas signed the
accession instruments for the treaties, Israel reissued tenders for the
construction of 708 settlement housing units in the Israeli settlement of
Gilo, while Israeli forces demolished 32 Palestinian-owned homes and other
structures in the occupied West Bank, forcibly displacing 60 people,
according to data collected by Ir Amim, an Israeli civil society group,
and the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Under the
Geneva Conventions and the ICC statute, settlement construction and the
deliberate forcible transfer of civilians from their homes and communities
in occupied territory are war crimes.
Israel has ratified core
human rights treaties but officially claims that its rights obligations do
not extend to Palestinians in the territory it occupies, where it says the
laws of armed conflict apply exclusively. UN rights bodies have completely
rejected this argument on the basis that an occupying power’s human rights
obligations extend to people living under its effective control. Israel
additionally claims, also in the face of nearly universal rejection, that
the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits transferring its civilian
population into occupied territory, does not apply to its settlements in
the West Bank.
*** For more Human Rights Watch reporting on Israel/Palestine,
please visit:
http://www.hrw.org/middle-eastn-africa/israel-palestine
For
more information, please contact: In Jerusalem, Bill Van Esveld
(English): +972-54-920-4062; or +972-59-507-5886 (mobile); or [email protected]
In Washington, DC, Joe Stork (English): +1-202-299-4925 (mobile); or
[email protected]
In Cairo, Tamara Alrifai (English, Arabic, French, Spanish):
+20-122-751-2450 (mobile); or
[email protected]. Follow on Twitter @TamaraAlrifai
|
|
|