Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
www.ccun.org www.aljazeerah.info |
Opinion Editorials, August 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||
Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles) www.aljazeerah.info
|
Not Too Big to Jail:
Why Eliot Spitzer Is
Wall Street's Worst Nightmare
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 22, 2013 Before Eliot Spitzer’s infamous resignation as
governor of New York in March 2008, he was one of our fiercest champions
against Wall Street corruption, in a state that had some of the toughest
legislation for controlling the banks. It may not be a coincidence that the
revelation of his indiscretions with a high-priced call girl came less than
a month after he published a bold editorial in the Washington Post titled “Predatory
Lenders’ Partner in Crime: How the Bush Administration Stopped the
States from Stepping in to Help Consumers.”
The editorial exposed the collusion between the Treasury, the Federal
Reserve and Wall Street in deregulating the banks in the guise of regulating
them, by taking regulatory power away from the states. It was an issue of
the federal government versus the states, with the Feds representing the
banks and the states representing consumers. Five years later, Spitzer has set out to take some of that local regulatory power back, in his run for New York City comptroller. Mounting the attack against him, however, are not just Wall Street banks but women’s groups opposed to this apparent endorsement of the exploitation of women. On August 17th, the New York Post endorsed Spitzer’s opponent and ran a scathing cover story attempting to embarrass Spitzer based on the single issue of his personal life. Lynn Parramore, who considers herself a feminist, countered in an August 8th Huffington Post article that it is likely to be in the best interests of the very women who are opposing him to forgive and move on. His stand for women’s reproductive rights and other feminist issues is actually quite strong, and his role as Wall Street watchdog protected women from predatory financial practices. As New York Attorney General, he was known as the “Sheriff of Wall Street.” He is one of the few people with not only the insight and experience to expose Wall Street corruption but the courage to go after the perpetrators.
Targeted for Take-down The February 2008 Washington Post article that
preceded Spitzer’s political travails was written when the state attorneys
general were being preempted by the Federal Reserve as watchdogs of the
banks. Critics called it a case of
the fox
guarding the hen house. Spitzer wrote:
Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer
protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending
practices by mortgage lenders. . . . These and other practices, we noticed,
were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread
nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial
markets.
Even though predatory lending was becoming a national problem, the Bush
administration looked the other way and did nothing to protect American
homeowners. In fact, the government chose instead to align itself with the
banks that were victimizing consumers. . . . [A]s New York attorney general,
I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the
void left by the federal government. . . .
Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it
embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from
protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal
government was turning a blind eye. . . . The administration accomplished
this feat through an obscure federal agency called the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). . . . In 2003, during the height of the
predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National
Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending
laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new
rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer
protection laws against national banks. The federal government's actions
were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general,
and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules. But
the unanimous opposition of the 50 states did not deter, or even slow, the
Bush administration in its goal of protecting the banks. In fact, when my
office opened an investigation of possible discrimination in mortgage
lending by a number of banks, the OCC filed a federal lawsuit to stop the
investigation.
Less than a month after publishing this editorial, Spitzer had been exposed,
disgraced, and was out of office.
Greg Palast
pointed to the fact that Spitzer was the single politician standing in
the way of a $200 billion windfall from the Federal Reserve, guaranteeing
the toxic mortgage-backed securities of the same banking predators that were
responsible for the subprime debacle. While the Federal Reserve was trying
to bail them out, Spitzer was trying to regulate them, bringing suit on
behalf of consumers.3 But he was quickly silenced, and any state
attorneys general who might get similar ideas in the future would be blocked
by the federal “oversight” then being imposed on state regulation.
A Rooster to Guard the Hen House
In a July 2013 article titled “Why
Eliot Spitzer's Return Terrifies Big Finance,”
Thomas Ferguson, Professor of Political Science at the University of
Massachusetts and a senior fellow at the Roosevelt Institute, wrote of
Spitzer’s bid for comptroller: Suddenly, the Masters of the Universe were staring at
their worst nightmare: the prospect of a comeback by the only major
politician in the U.S. whose deeds — and not simply words —prove that he
does not think corporate titans are too big to jail.
And who in 2013 with business as usual once again the order of the day, is
promising to review how the Comptroller’s Office, which controls New York
City’s vast pension funds, does business with Wall Street and corporate
America.
Yves Smith, writing on her blog Naked
Capitalism on July 25th,
expanded on this threat. She noted that private equity [PE] investment
managers had persuaded their clients that their limited partnership
agreements [LPAs] were a form of “trade secret,” and that nobody was looking
closely at whether PE firms were complying with the fee and expense
provisions of their agreements:
Public pension fund investors have almost universally acceded to the demands
of PE firms to exempt the LPAs and cash flow reports from state FOIA laws,
which keeps the eyes of the press and the public off the documents.
. . . However, the New York City Comptroller has access to this
critical information. Hence the freakout at the prospect that
Spitzer might get the job.
Hence also
the $1.5 million ad campaign against Spitzer brought by a coalition of
business leaders, labor unions and women’s groups.
The Issues that Matter to Women
On July 10th, the head of the local chapter of a national women’s advocacy
group
asked a small gathering outside City Hall:
Do we want an elected official who has broken the law and who has
participated in sustaining an industry that we all know has a long history
of exploiting women and girls?
The speaker lumped Spitzer with Anthony Weiner, who is running for mayor
after sending out sexually explicit tweets, and Vito Lopez, who is running
for City Council after resigning from the Assembly over sexual harassment
allegations. She asked whether these men would address the issues that
matter to women, "or are they just going to see us as objects?"
Sexual exploitation is an issue that matters to women, but the best way to
save women from the sort of desperation that leads to exploitation is to
keep them out of ruinous debt. Wall Street fraud, corruption and abuse have
caused millions of homeowners to lose their homes and have tipped cities
toward bankruptcy; and Spitzer is one of the brave few who has exposed and
attempted to prosecute those predatory practices.
As comptroller, he could make more information available to the public
concerning the companies in which public pension funds are invested, look
out for exploitive fees, insist on plain English reporting of derivatives
exposure, and take steps to ensure that nurses and teachers are not being
financially exploited. He can monitor contracts and business dealings and
help protect the city from the kinds of rip-off schemes that deplete city
funds for education, infrastructure, and the social safety nets that women,
particularly, rely on.
In a December 2011 article in
Slate
titled “We
Own Wall Street,” Spitzer argued that
bad corporate behavior could be stopped by a political movement uniting
shareholders, pension funds and mutual funds – the actual owners of the
corporations – who could then take coordinated action demanding transparency
and accountability.
This is the sort of creative thinking that will be needed if we the people
are to take back our power from Wall Street and the corporatocracy. We need
a mass movement, coordinated action, and leaders who can organize it. Eliot
Spitzer is one of the few people in a position to play that role who have
the experience, vision and courage to carry it through.
_______________________
Ellen Brown is an attorney, president of the
Public Banking Institute, and author of twelve books including the
best-selling Web of Debt. In
The Public Bank Solution,
her latest book, she explores successful public banking models historically
and globally. Her websites are
http://WebofDebt.com,
http://PublicBankSolution.com,
and
http://PublicBankingInstitute.org.
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org. |