Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Report of the UN Committee of Independent
Experts on Gaza War
By Stephen Lendman
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 27, 2010
On September 21, the UN Human Rights Council's independent fact finding
Committee issued its report titled, "No Safe Place," assessing "investigat(ions)
and report(s) on violations of human rights law and international
humanitarian law during" Operation Cast Lead. Its members included:
-- Professor John Dugard, Chairman, former UN Special Human Rights
Rapporteur for Occupied Palestine; -- Norwegian Judge Finn
Lynghjem; -- Chilean attorney Gonzalo Boye; -- Professor
Corte-Real, a forensic body damage evaluator; and -- solicitor Ms.
Raelene Sharp. On February 21, it held an initial meeting with the
Arab League's Secretary-General in Cairo, then entered Gaza the next day
through the Rafah crossing. The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights
organized its six day visit with a wide range of persons, including Cast
Lead victims, witnesses, doctors, lawyers, journalists, business people,
and members of NGOs, UN agencies and Hamas. Sites visited
included hospitals, schools, universities, mosques, businesses, police
stations, government buildings, UN facilities, private homes, and
agricultural lands - all devastated by destruction or damage.
Three times the Committee requested Israeli cooperation, getting no
response. "The Committee regrets the decision of the Government of Israel
to withhold cooperation." It also stonewalled the Goldstone Commission, as
it always does to prevent independent investigations from exposing its
crimes. "Operating under internationally recognized standards, the
report documents the injuries suffered and their alleged causes." The
Committee obtained firsthand evidence of great loss of life and injuries
in Gaza, as well as the vast amount of destruction, mostly affecting
civilians, their homes, neighborhoods, and other non-military facilities -
a clear violation of international law, documented clearly in earlier
articles. Palestinian losses were immense, also documented
earlier. Israel's were minor - four civilians and ten soldiers killed
(three by friendly fire), and 148 wounded. Palestinians had only
"unsophisticated weapons" against the world's fourth most powerful
military, using everything (except its nuclear capability), including
illegal weapons like white phosphorous. "It was clear to the
Committee that the IDF had not distinguished between civilians and
civilian objects and military targets. Both the loss of life and the
damage to property were disproportionate to the harm suffered by Israel or
any threatened harm." Israel was the clear aggressor in violation of
international law, waging premeditated war largely against civilians. The
Goldstone Commission highlighted the crime, saying: "The report
concludes that the Israeli military operation was directed at the people
of Gaza as whole, in furtherance of an overall and continuing policy aimed
at punishing the Gaza population, and in a deliberate policy of
disproportionate force aimed at the civilian population. The destruction
of food supply installations, water sanitation systems, concrete factories
and residential housing was the result of a deliberate and systematic
policy which has made the daily process of living, and dignified living,
more difficult for the civilian population." Israel willfully
killed hundreds of civilians as a result of "disproportionate attacks,"
including on hospitals, homes, and other civilian structures. "Repeatedly,
the Israeli Defense Forces failed to adequately distinguish between
combatants and civilians, as the laws of war strictly require....Pursuing
justice in this case is essential because no state or armed group should
be above the law." Failure to do so "will have a deeply corrosive effect
on international justice, and reveal an unacceptable hypocrisy. As a
service to the hundreds of civilians who needlessly died and for the equal
application of international justice, the perpetrators of serious
violations must be held to account." So far, they have not. Gaza
remains under siege, and world leaders are doing nothing to end it and
demand justice for Israeli war crimes. Instead they support a bogus "peace
process," that's neither a process or a way to peace. It's the same
shameless on and off 35 year charade going nowhere, unless the PA agrees
to unconditional surrender, the only outcome Israel will accept.
On September 22, Haaretz report its latest wrinkle, headlined "US won't
comment on reports of (Jonathan) Pollard release deal," saying:
Citing unnamed sources, Israeli Radio said Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu's cabinet might propose extending the (September 26 expiring)
construction "freeze" in exchange for releasing the convicted spy. Why not
when no freeze exists. Construction continues unabated. PA President
Mahmoud Abbas accepts the charade as well as the Obama administration and
Western media. The reported pressure on Netanyahu is bogus. He loses
nothing by agreeing or perhaps negotiating an illusion of compromise.
"Pollard is regarded as a hero in Israel, but a traitor by the US
government. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for passing classified
documents to the Israeli government in the 1980s while working in the US
Navy's intelligence unit." For years, Israel asked US presidents
for clemency, so far without results. If Netanyahu succeeds, he'll gain
political prestige and more popularity at home. However, On June 20, 2009,
Haaretz writer Amir Oren explained that US intelligence officials
"unequivocally oppose" the release, saying doing so "will undermine US
security practices and complicate counterintelligence." Then, and likely
now, "The US intelligence community hasn't altered its position. It's
unknown whether Obama will go along, given how much he yields to Israel on
most everything requested. Conclusions from the Committee's Report
It explained that: -- as an occupying power, "Israel is
obligated to comply with the Fourth Geneva Convention" and other related
international laws; -- "aggression" isn't clearly defined, so it
couldn't conclude whether "Israel's offensive constituted" it; --
"Israel's actions could not be justified as self-defense;" -- it
urged the principles of proportionality be applied to assess criminal
responsibility; and -- it "could not examine" whether Israel or
Hamas committed international terrorism "as (its) meaning (is) too
uncertain; consequently, criminal responsibility was best measured in
accordance with the rules of international humanitarian law."
Nonetheless, the Committee found "serious violations of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the Convention on the Rights of
the Child." Also, Fourth Geneva and its Additional Protocols were
violated, especially on the issue of collective punishment, specifically
prohibited at all times under all circumstances. On issues of
crimes of war and against humanity, "The Committee found that the IDF was
responsible for the crime of indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks
on civilians....It rejected Israel's determination of who is a civilian."
Members of Hamas' civil government are not combatants "as claimed by
Israel." Nor are police. "The Committee found that the IDF was
responsible for the crime of killing, wounding and terrorizing civilians,"
based on the numbers of dead and wounded as well as Israel's use of banned
weapons and intense bombardment for over three weeks. "The
Committee rejected Israel's claim that it warned civilians in advance to
leave." Use of leaflets and phone calls "only served to cause confusion
and panic. Incessant bombing and misleading warnings of this kind served
to terrorize the population." Where could they go with Gaza under siege,
its borders closed? The Committee called the IDF "responsible for
the wanton destruction of property and that such destruction could not be
justified on grounds of military necessity." The harm done was
disproportionate and illegal. Israel committed grievous crimes of
war and against humanity, whitewashing them through internal
investigations and obstruction of independent ones by refusing to
cooperate. The Committee called Cast Lead so grave, "it was
compelled to consider whether (genocide) had been committed. Without
question in the context of 62 years of displacement and persecution and 43
years of brutal military occupation, punctuated by regular attacks,
killings, targeted assassinations, arrests, torture, and other types of
abuses daily. The Committee thus concluded that Israel "committed
war crimes, crimes against humanity and, possibly genocide in the course
of Operation Cast Lead" alone. Responsible military and civilian officials
are culpable, yet so far unpunished. The Committee also said
"there is no indication that Israel has opened an investigation into the
actions of those who designed, planned, ordered, and oversaw 'Operation
Cast Lead.' " It also found Hamas guilty of firing rockets into
Israel, a defensive action in response to Israel's attack, and minor by
comparison. Some Final Comments The Palestinian Centre for
Human Rights said Israel proved itself "genuinely unwilling to comply with
its international legal obligation to conduct effective investigations,
and appropriate prosecutions into the systematic violations of
international law committed" during its offensive. So far, only
one prosecution occurred - for credit card theft, while serious war crimes
have been whitewashed and ignored. As a result, responsible officials keep
persecuting millions of Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank and East
Jerusalem. They're no match against the world fourth most powerful
military allied with collaborationist PA officials, principally Mahmoud
Abbas and his appointed prime minister, Salam Fayyad, self-serving
imperial tools. On September 27, the Committee will present its
report to the UN Human Rights Council. It will highlight Cast Lead's
seriousness. Hopefully, it will also demand those responsible be held
accountable, perhaps at the International Criminal Court (ICC). That's why
it was established, though it fails to fulfill its mandate. What
better time than now to do it, then take on American government for destroying Iraq
and Afghanistan, and bankrolling Israeli belligerency, supplying money,
weapons and munitions, both countries committing mass murder with
impunity. It's high time their day of reckoning arrived. It can't come a
moment too soon. Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be
reached at
[email protected]. Also visit his blog site at
sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with
distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive
Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays
at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/
|
|
|