Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Accelerating Fascism in Israel
By Stephen Lendman
Al-Jazeerah, ccun.org, April 19, 2010
Occupied Palestinians and Israeli Arabs never had rights in a
state affording them solely to Jews. Now even they're at risk as
democratic freedoms fast erode on their way to extinction; to wit, free
expression, a right without which all others are endangered. It includes
free speech, a free press, freedom of thought, culture, intellectual
inquiry, and the right to challenge government authority peacefully,
especially in times of war and cases of injustice, lawlessness,
incompetence, and abuses of power. Israel has no constitution or
specific laws guaranteeing equality or free expression. Yet its Basic Laws
protect human dignity and liberty as fundamental democratic values, more
rhetoric than fact given its persecution of journalist Anat Kam and
Haaretz's national security reporter Uri Blau. Kam (held under
house arrest since December) will be tried in mid-April for passing
confidential documents she removed while stationed in IDF General Yair
Naveh's office during her mandatory military service. Blau, fearing
assassination or a judicial lynching, is now hiding in London. Two
(internal security) Shin Bet gag orders (code name "Double-Take") were
judicially implemented to silence press discussion, on October 8, 2009 and
on January 1, 2010 for 90 days, now partially lifted. They're on
grounds of harming national security, damaging the investigative process,
and the ability of prosecutors to prove criminal liability. Part of it is
cited in an undated April richardsilverstein.com Tikun Olam article
headlined, "Anat Kam Gag Order Published for the First Time," stating:
"....publication about the investigation or that it even exists (is
prohibited), and on the judicial discussion of the matter and legal
decision rendered by the court which has been and will be conducted....
We seek that the gag prohibits publication even about the application
for a gag order, its content, and even the existence of a gag order in
this case; and any other publication likely to identify the respondent,
witnesses, suspects or others engaged in the investigation, including
publications of their images, addresses, or other identifying details."
On April 11, Haaretz writer Ofra Edelman headlined, "Ex-soldier
charged with espionage for leaking documents to Haaretz," saying:
"Among the materials Kam allegedly transferred to (Uri Blau) were (more
than 2,000) files showing that high-ranking Israel Defense Forces officers
had approved targeted assassinations of wanted Palestinians who could have
instead been detained," violating a Supreme Court order. Uri
Blau's Expose Kam's documents provided the basis for Blau's
December 4, 2008 Haaretz article headlined, "License to Kill," revealing
IDF Central Command-ordered targeted killings of two alleged terrorists -
Ziad Subahi Mahmad Malaisha and Ibrahim Ahmed Abd al-Latif Abed in
violation of a High Court ruling. Further "the most senior IDF echelons
approve(d), in advance and in writing, the harming of innocent
Palestinians during the course of the assassination operations."
According to B'Tselem, IDF assassins killed 232 Palestinians from October
2000 - October 2008, and another 154 non-targeted civilians
coincidentally. The common code names used are Pa'amon (preventive action)
and Sakum (targeted assassination). When carried out, official reports say
these were "arrest operations (or) exchanges of fire," force having been
authorized to intercept and kill. Involved was IDF Central Command
head, General Yair Naveh, in whose bureau Kam worked as a clerk, then
later as assistant bureau head. Authorizing the assassinations, he said
the target "leads a 'ticking' infrastructure and meets the required
criteria for a preventive strike." Another meeting in his office with
General Sami Turjeman, head of the Operations Directorate, ordered "no
more than five people" to be killed, the other three, of course, innocent
civilians. The next day, Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi approved
it, ordering only that it be done on a different date in light of planned
diplomatic meetings at the time. On December 14, 2006, High Court
President, Justice Aharon Barak, ruled that well-founded information is
necessary to say civilians intend hostile acts, and no one should be
assassinated or harmed in lieu of nonviolent workable alternatives. "In
other words, a person should not be assassinated if it is possible to
arrest him, interrogate and indict him." According to
international law Professor David Kretchmer, "It turns out that in total
contradiction to the High Court ruling, there are cases in which there is
an order to assassinate someone when it is possible to arrest him. Advance
approval to kill civilians who do not take part in hostile activities (or
against whom no evidence proves guilt) makes things even worse....
Postponing an operation for diplomatic reasons is unequivocal proof (that)
this is not a 'ticking bomb' situation." General Naveh (Central
Command head from 2005 - 2007) admitted that at times "no genuine attempts
are made to arrest wanted men." Saying they never happened on his watch,
he claimed Malaisha and Abed were legitimate targets as "ticking bombs,"
despite no evidence to prove it and in defiance of a High Court ruling.
"Don't bother me with the High Court orders," he said. "I don't know
when there were High Court orders and when there weren't. I know that a
targeted assassination is approved and there is a preventive action
procedure and I received instructions from the Operations Directorate."
The only State justification ever given is that targeted killings are
"an exceptional step (taken) only when there is no other, less severe way
of" acting. From seclusion in London, Haaretz published Blau's
April 10, 2010 article headlined, "This isn't just a war for my freedom
but for Israel's image," saying: he never imagined his foreign trip would
prevent him from "return(ing) to Tel Aviv as a journalist and a free man,
only because I published reports that were not convenient to the
establishment." So when told if he returned, he "could be silenced
forever (and/or) be charged for crimes related to espionage, (he) decided
to fight," repeating the above title he chose for this article.
As a journalist, he expressed commitment to provide "as much
information as possible and in the best way, with maximum objectivity.
(For Haaretz, his) name has appeared, alone and with others (revealing)
exposes dealing with (high) public figures and institutions of all kinds."
None could have been published without sources and corroborating
documents. All previous military related exposes "were vetted by
(their) censors before publication." They weren't "pleasant to read," but
no matter. A journalist's job is to provide facts on relevant "goings-on
around them....but no Israeli journalist has known until now that such
exposes could have him declared an enemy of the state and find himself in
jail" or perhaps killed. The State of Israel v. Anat Kam
Charges include: 1. "Serious Espionage (divulging secret
information with the intent to harm the security of the state) - an
offence against clause 13b of the Penal Law 1977 (hence: the law).
2. Serious Espionage (gathering secret information with the intention to
harm the security of the state) - an offence against clause 113c of the
law." The charges explain her exposure "to many documents and
presentations in various degrees of classification, authored in the
various departments of the General Staff, the Chief of Staff's office, and
the various divisions of the command" with respect to military operations,
discussion summaries, IDF targets, and related information.
"During her military service the accused stored in a special folder the
documents and presentations and, near her discharge from the IDF, on or
about May 2007, the accused, through another, copied the contents of the
file onto two discs, one for documents and the other for presentations."
"The accused did so out of ideological motivations and with the
intent to damage the security of the state, among other means, through
publishing the documents to the general public." She took the
classified materials home without authorization to do so. "In or around
June 2007, (she) copied the document disc onto the mobile IBM computer at
her home....contain(ing) over two thousand documents, 700 of which were
classified as "secret (or) top secret." "On or around September
2008, the accused, acting without legal authority and with the intention
to harm the security of the state, delivered a large amount of documents
to journalist Uri Blau," including "top secret (and) secret" ones. He then
began publishing them in November 2008 and in subsequent articles.
Haaretz Responds to State Charges On April 11, Haaretz Service
"answer(ed) four key questions on the Anat Kam case:" 1. Does
Haaretz's protection for Uri Blau and his sources harm state security?
"Of course not." All were "submitted to the military censor and
approved....before publication, as required by law." State security
depends not only on abiding by censor regulations, but also on upholding
democratic principles and values, "including a free press. The agreement
signed between Blau and the Shin Bet security service proves that (it)
understands this as well." 2. Does Blau still have classified
documents? If so, why hasn't he returned them to Shin Bet? "Blau
left on vacation with no classified documents in his possession." But he
maintains previously used materials for all his articles. "Haaretz,
therefore, believes that it cannot pass on all (his) documents (to the IDF
and Shin Bet) because its senior officials may use them to trace his
sources." Blau believes he acted according to his agreement with
Shin Bet and broke no law. "He passed on dozens of classified
documents....and the defense establishment had no complaint about" ones he
chose. Blau gave Shin Bet dozens of printouts and his personal
computer, "which was destroyed in his presence." Shortly after doing it,
Kam was arrested on suspicion for having been the source. 3. "Why
isn't Blau returning to Israel to explain all this?" He took a
three-month vacation to the Far East with his fiancee. While away, Kam was
arrested. Shin Bet told Haaretz it reneged on its agreement, thus no
longer assuring the immunity of his sources, especially Kam. If he
returns now, she may be further harmed as he'll be questioned on arrival,
given a lie detector test, have his entire document archive examined, and
called as a witness against her, besides endangering his personal safety.
4. In Haaretz's judgment, can state security be safeguarded without
revealing confidential sources? Indeed so. "The combination has
worked and will keep working, and it's important to ensure" no change of
policy so future sources will volunteer information they'd otherwise be
reluctant to do. According to Haaretz writers Ofra Edelman, Anshel
Pfeffer and Gili Izikovich, in their April 12 article headlined, "Anat Kam
waives immunity, urges Uri Blau to return to Israel:" She's
Blau's source, "her defense attorney Avigdor Feldman told Haaretz on"
April 11, adding: "I believe he will bring back the documents, he
will not be harmed and the affair with Anat will also come to an end, I
hope, quickly." Blau's attorneys, Mibi Moser and Tal Leiblich,
called it "a positive development." Meanwhile, a number of journalists
signed a petition requesting no prosecution of Blau, saying authorities
haven't previously done so for holding secret information, which most
reporter/writers at times get. Thus far, the IDF Spokesman said only (on
April 11) that claims Blau reported "are upsetting and distorted."
On April 12, Haaretz writer and Haaretz Service headlined, "Anat Kam: I
stole IDF documents to expose West Bank war crimes," saying:
According to newly released court materials, Kam explained that:
"Classified documents reveal that the Israel Defense Forces had committed
war crimes in the West Bank....and that her motivation for removing them
was to expose 'certain aspects of the IDF's conduct in the West Bank that
I thought were of interest to the public.' " She added that "if
and when the war crime the IDF was and is committing in the West Bank
would be investigated, then I would have evidence to present." She
believed nothing she did endangered Israel's security because she focused
only on "the principles and the policies that were behind the top
officers' decision," not specific military details. By exposing
these crimes, she thought she "would make a change...." Kam now
faces trial and a possible life sentence. Blau fears he's in danger no
matter where in the world he hides. Nazareth-based journalist/author
Jonathan Cook raised the specter of Israel's "dark underbelly," its
tarnished image, and "battle for what is left of its soul," given its
eroding democratic freedoms and fast track toward fascism in a nation
where no one is safe, even Jews. Stephen Lendman
lives in Chicago and can be reached at
[email protected].
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to
cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive
Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US
Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived
for easy listening. http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/
|
|
|