Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

 

U.S. Would Join Israeli Strike on Iran,

According to Officials from Obama and Romney Campaigns

JERUSALEM, August 13, 2012 (Xinhua) --

The United States would support Israel in the event that the latter decides to independently attack Iran's nuclear facilities, the Ma'ariv daily reported Monday, citing messages recently conveyed from top American officials.

A series of clandestine messages relayed by both Republican and Democratic officials suggest that U.S. President Barack Obama would be forced to join Israel if it were to launch a military operation against Iran prior to the U.S. presidential election in November, Ma'ariv said.

The unnamed officials behind the communique are said to include political advisers to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and Obama associates, who opined that the president would not be able to ignore an Israeli attack, let alone a harsh Iranian reprisal against the Israeli home front.

Sitting on the sidelines while Israel is engaged in combat could see Obama losing the election. On the other hand, aiding Israel in countering an Iranian backlash would help him secure a second term in office, the U.S. officials estimated.

They said that the U.S. military would likely bolster an Israeli strike with its own aerial assets, munitions and personnel, and assist in defending the Israeli home front in the event of a missile strike by Iran and the Lebanon-based Hezbollah.

Israel's envoy to Washington Michael Oren has conveyed similar assessments to Jerusalem following discussions with diplomatic officials, as well as senior members of American Israel Public Affairs Committee, the pro-Israel lobby in Washington, which maintains regular contact with top officials on Capitol Hill, according to Ma'ariv.

The report comes amid a growing debate in Israel for and against a strike, with local media outlets either siding with or slamming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak's saber-rattling on the Iranian issue.

A poll published Sunday by Channel 10 TV showed that a larger number of Israelis -- 46 percent -- oppose a unilateral strike on Iran, without U.S. backing, while 32 percent are in favor.

The survey's results are in line with recent reports that Israel's top military leadership is vehemently opposed to the idea of a unilateral strike on Iran, citing fears that such an attack would likely spark a regional conflict with harsh repercussions.

But both Netanyahu and Barak have recently said that time is running out for international sanctions and diplomacy to convince Tehran to halt its disputed nuclear program, which Israel and much of the West believe is geared towards producing an atomic bomb, emphasizing that Israel will ultimately decide how to best defend itself against what it perceives as an existential threat.

Military commentators have said that among Netanyahu and Barak' s biggest dilemmas is launching a pre-emptive strike without the United States, in which case Israel can expect to set back Iran's nuclear program by no more than a couple of years, at best.

"In this regard, the question of whether Obama would decide to join a military operation against Iran is critical. Intervention by the U.S. military can significantly delay (Iran's nuke program), " Eli Berdenstein, a veteran political commentator wrote Monday.

Netanyahu and Obama are due to meet at the United Nations in New York on Sept. 27, where both leaders are scheduled to address the General Assembly, and hold further discussions on the Iranian issue.

The meeting will take place as Iran's nuclear program fast approaches a critical threshold -- attaining the necessary means to assemble a nuclear weapon.

Editor: An